Politicizing Sports

From iGeek
Jump to: navigation, search

Progressives seem unhappy when anyone else is happy and not waving their flags of anti-patriotism. They see some injustice in the world (real or imagined) and they feel compelled to lecture and spoil anyone else's good time. Nothing demonstrates this more than the recent politicization of sports -- with the completely expected consequences that this alienates enough of the audience, to ruin it for everyone.


No one is saying that this is the first time sports has been politicized. From Germany Politicizing the 1936 Olympics, to terrorist massacres of Jews (11 dead) in the Munich Olympics in 1972, 1980 and American boycott of Moscow Olympics (not to mention, many boycotts before that), and so on. [1] There have always been racists, bigots and spoilers trying to shit on other people's fun, and usually the sanctimonious asshats wore the uniform of leftists or "progressives" (at least in their minds). Such is life.

But it has never ended well. It has never lead to more understanding, or support for a cause. It always polarized groups, or lead to more obnoxious stupidity. Fortunately, in domestic Sports (with a few exceptions) we generally left room for other Americans to disagree, without being too obnoxious about it. At least until Obama.

Once our Community Organizer in Chief (Obama) took over as President, and celebrated the ignorant, bigoted, racist organizations like Black Lives Matter, and their lies about how poor gentle giant black men are being shot for having their hands up, things have gotten worse. The left has been doing it's best to start a race war. Just see everything as racially motivated, incite groups like BLM to create riots and commit acts of vandalism and violence (or even murder), then excuse those wrong means as justified, and stir the pot to see what happens. The change agents imagine this will lead to change -- without having the intellectual capacity to realize that not all change is good change.

Their intolerant bigotry in the name of Social Justice, spread to the weakest minded athletes... who want to be known for something more important than playing games and entertaining people for money.

Is Kneeling Disrespectful?

❝ When exactly did kneeling become "disrespectful"? Once word gets out, I'm sure many marriage proposals will be answered with a slap, and I can only imagine how angry God will be when he finds out what people have been doing in his pews! ❞

The answer was that while farting in a bathroom isn't considered rude, farting in an elevator is. Context matters.

Sports are supposed to be about entertainment and escapism, and unity (both sides rooting for other teams, but enjoying the spectacle of non-violent combat). Chiding each other over beers and hot dogs (bad, overpriced food). They are a celebration of the freedom that allows us to waste money, and be entertained.

So idiots like Colin Kaepernick bringing his own ignorance-based agenda into spitting on an American tradition, is shockingly un--welcomed by some. That isn't to say he can't express his views -- he can fart his views off the field, all he wants. But when he has his audience trapped in the elevator of opening ceremonies, is the wrong time.

Racism Tourette's - To some small mined folks, everything is racism.

Colin Kaepernick is no MLK. He is not fighting for civil rights. He got a girlfriend that convinced him of her cause, and he played attention whore. He has a legal right to express his views -- but he is not free from the consequences of his choices or comments. Intentionally offending a part of your audience is going to get backlash: when you fire the first shot in a culture war, be prepared for collateral damage.

I suspect fewer of the people that criticize Kaepernick are racists, than those who are BLM supporters, or are cheering on him, or support the protest and politicization of the game. If he were a white baseball player, I think, the same people would be equally outraged: shut the fuck up and play ball.

But Kaepernick could have been worse


Yes, at first he sat down. But after some military veterans and others complained, he said he'd take a knee instead of sitting, as that was somehow less disrespectful. And I guess it is, if you ignore the context of him politicizing the game, and forcing his agenda on millions of Americans who are far more informed on the topics than he is. He's a millionaire paid entertainer, and instead of entertaining, he's telling the audience that they're all racists for not having the same views he does. But what does a 20 something, sheltered, millionaire, athlete know about oppression and injustice in the real world?

While that might appeal to 1/3rd the audience that agrees with him, it alienates another two thirds (who either disagree with him, or don't think this is the right place to be making that statement). So like a guy that belches loudly at a nice restaurant... yes, it could be worse, he could fart or crap himself at the table, but that doesn't mean he is polite or right to be doing that, at that venue.

But what about Tim Tebow?

Tim Tebow was detested by the left, because he expressed his views on God (by silently praying), on the field. But the differences is that honoring a tradition is different than dishonoring one. Anyone comparing the two, and ignoring that, is either a fool or fraud. Athletes have always prayed or thanked God for their accomplishments. And that's a positive giving thanks act, not pointing fingers, insulting tradition or the audience by saying, "you are racists, and I'm ashamed of my country" for an imagined slight. Then of course there's the hypocrisy of the left and media that was decrying Tebow, and wishing him ill for his display, but celebrating Tebow and clan, for giving Americans the finger over not buying into the BLM's lies.


ESPN was told by common sense not to politicize sports, that they were just entertaining escapism. They chose to go the other way. Now they're damn near going bankrupt as viewership is way down, advertising is way down, and the trends for the future look way down. So what did we learn? more...

What's this really about?


Some will lie and claim this is about free speech -- but no one has a problem with these folks protesting on their free time. The problem is that they want us to pay them, for protesting the flag, anthem and America, on time that the public is paying for them to entertain.

Of course we know what this is really about, a racists terrorist organization called Black Lives Matter.

Now I know saying the truth about the organization will trigger some. And I'm not saying that everyone in Black Lives Matter is a racist, or everything they believe is wrong. It's the 80% that give the rest a bad name. They are based on the lie that an innocent black guy was shot because of his skin color, also the lie that they care about black lives when they're being lost to other black men shooting them at 100x the rate that they're shot by cops, or that they care about the civil rights of whites that are killed at the hands of cops, in far greater numbers than blacks are, and so on. They're just a divisive, riotous, bunch of ignorant bigots, disrupting event after event for attention.

Some troll whined, "when was the last time a white guy was shot in a car for a minor pull-over?" -- I pointed out that was a couple weeks earlier, with Kevin Hoops on 9/1, in Ohio. It only made the local news in Ohio, because it didn't divide us as a nation, and feed a false narrative. And of course the prior week a couple different events in Orange County had unarmed white guys shot, but BLM has no interest in abuses against people of the wrong skin color: their cause is racism.

Deep down, might there be some softer valid points in BLM? Sure. But it's hard to dig thru the stench and hypocrisy of their foul means and methods to see them. If they weren't a far left organization, the SPLC would label them a terrorist group. But again, my point wasn't to debate the validity of BLM, it was to point out that there's many that disagree with you disrupting their sports event, to cram any agenda down their throats. But especially a racist and ignorance based on.

Trump and the Media


Things were bad enough when the NFL was simply putting woman beaters, animal abusers and murderers on the field. Now they put even lower low-lifes: progressive activists.

The issue was dying, it's estimated that only 10 of the players were taking the knee for the church of progressive stupidity, before Trump's attention to it. Of course it had been over a year, and still hadn't gone away, and the point of not-politicizing our sporting events was still valid. Just as is the fact that the media hates the flag and symbols of freedom or this country, longer before they conned gullible football players into anti-american displays for attention. [2]

Trump of course injected himself into this, by pointing out the truths that the NFL attendance is down, that if the owners had any respect for their audience that they'd tell their players to knock-it-the-fuck-out (or in his vernacular, threaten to "fire the sons of bitches"), and of course, since Trump said it, the DNC-Media jumped on the other side, and screamed it was a free speech issue, and how wrong he was to get involved, and other histrionics.

It's amazing that the same Press and Left who had nothing but fawning worship over Obama injecting himself in everything from self-defense shootings to basketball picks, suddenly thinks the President should mind his own business, when it comes to millionaire athletes disrespecting the flag, sport and country. I keep asking for a guidebook of standards from the left, but their standards are still: democrats=good, republicans=bad, no matter what the issue.

I happen to dislike Trump jumping into every issue, for the same reason I was annoyed when Obama jumped on every issue half informed and made things worse. I don't want any President to do that, even when I agree with what he's said (like in this case). So if the Press would shut-up, I'd be annoyed at Trump.

But instead they go so over the top with stupidity, that I'm more annoyed at them than Trump:

  • This is not a free speech issue, when on the field they are paid entertainers
  • This is not about the media's interest in sport at all -- if anyone but Trump had said the NFL should end because of CTE (health issues) or other things, the media would have celebrated it. They hate the sport. They just reflexively hate Trump and the Americans he represents, even more.
  • This wasn't a boycott, or even call for one. He was rambling about why the NFL is losing share, by politicizing issues and alienating their audience. Pointing out the problems, or saying the audience should vote with their wallet, isn't the same as calling for a boycott. (Proof is democrats decry FoxNews, or celebrate when they drop in ratings. The media would never claim a politician saying that was calling for a Boycott, unless they actually use those words).

And the NFL is picking the losing side on this.

  • What better way to clarify the divide than to push clowns to act out more, and show what the left stands for?
  • Instead of conceding the truth in what Trump is saying (that the stadium is for sports, not politics), and that there's a place for politics, and the national anthem of a ballgame isn't the right place. They choose instead to use their government granted monopoly, to attacking the administration, and alienate a large part of their audience in the process. It just doesn't seem prudent.

When Kaepernick started his #KneelToo movement (or Trump responded), the NFL could have chosen: (a) the wise path: ignore and say nothing (b) the patriotic path: agree with the President that if they can warn/fine employees for wearing purple shoes, or dancing in the end-zone, then they can certainly tell them to take their protests somewhere else (or else) (c) the diplomatic path: walked the line and say that while they don't endorse BLM and the protests, they won't fire or restrict their employees from making displays. Instead they chose, none of those and went with (d) To perpetuate ignorance of BLM's hypocrisy, to make big displays against the nation and President, then to punish/intimidate/threaten players like Pittsburgh Steelers Villanueva to go along, and they forced him to apologize publicly for it. So much for the NFL's false claim that this was about defense of its players' rights to free speech. more...



This whole mess is created by the left. They just can't stand people enjoying a sport without injecting their cause into everything.

This started under Obama, and because of Obama's support of BLM and divisive identity politics polarized Americans when asshats started politicizing their entertainment more than Hollywood already had. It has been festering for years. And the lash of BLM's intolerance (towards those not in solidarity with them), causes the backlash of pissed off viewers, and retaliation.

Trump tapped into that, by exposing the hypocrites, and pointing out that millionaires shouldn't spit on their audience who go to games for fun -- not for silent shaming from clueless SJW's. Some people just want to watch a game, and have their side's views be treated with the same respect that the contemptuous, disrespectful trolls demand for their special interests (while showing contempt for everyone else's views).

I think the same thing about businesses and CEO's. Pick your battles wisely. If there's a real civil rights issue, sure, get involved. But if this is disagreements in nuanced degrees over some injustices by cops that happen to people of all colors, and one special interest is screaming that their plight is worse than others (despite numbers to the contrary), then you might not want to alienate a large part of your audience to get involved. Let it play out in the court of public opinion, and not on your stage.

Trump tapped into a sentiment of his side. But it wouldn't even be a sentiment, if the other side hadn't started it.

Cancelled : through a quirk of family scheduling, my wife and I got this Thanksgiving off, from visiting her family or mine. Our solution was we were going to take this opportunity to go to Dallas and watch the Cowboys play. But once they jumped on the ignorance/hate bandwagon, we stopped our plans. They'll still make money without us, but I'm not contributing to the problem. And they chose to make themselves part of the problem.


📚 References

More links

Fan revolt




Trump Links

Rule or no Rule?

This has been going around, but it may not be true:

NFL rule book specifically requires both teams appear on the field for the playing of the anthem, standing, remaining quiet, and holding their helmets in their left hands. Failure to do so can result in fines, suspensions, and the loss of draft picks.

The rules are found on pages A62-63 of the league’s game operations manual: “The National Anthem must be played prior to every NFL game, and all players must be on the sideline for the National Anthem. During the National Anthem, players on the field and bench area should stand at attention, face the flag, hold helmets in their left hand, and refrain from talking. The home team should ensure that the American flag is in good condition. It should be pointed out to players and coaches that we continue to be judged by the public in this area of respect for the flag and our country. Failure to be on the field by the start of the National Anthem may result in discipline, such as fines, suspensions, and/or the forfeiture of draft choice(s) for violations of the above, including first offenses.”

Any questions?

Many looked for it, and couldn't find it. This fact check seems to disagree that it's part of the rules: